chevron-thin-right chevron-thin-left brand cancel-circle search youtube-icon google-plus-icon linkedin-icon facebook-icon twitter-icon toolbox download check linkedin phone twitter-old google-plus facebook profile-male chat calendar profile-male
Ask a question
The Unit Testing Company
Development Resources
Knowledge Base
Welcome to Typemock Community! Here you can ask and receive answers from other community members. If you liked or disliked an answer or thread: react with an up- or downvote.

Related questions

Excluding evaluation for propeties for a type in recording

0 votes
Is there a way to exclude recording for properties in the recording block ? Or exclude a type from mocking like CLR types are excluded ?

Let's say test class is TestClass and not to be mocked class is NotMockedClass. 


class NotMockedClass
{
public string DontMockProperty { get; }
}

class TestClass
{
public int TestMethod(
}

[Test, VerifyMock]
public TestCase()
{
NotMockedClass nmObject = new NotMockedClass();
TestClass testObject = new TestClass();
    using (RecordExpectations recorder = RecorderManager.StartRecording())
    {
        recorder.ExpectAndReturn(testObject.TestMethod(nmObject.DontMockProperty), 4);
    }
}


I don't want nmObject.DontMockProperty don't be mocked or set expectation.
asked by bhaveshbusa
Report User
 (1.2k points)

4 Answers

0 votes
Currently there is no way to prevent the class from being mocked, is there a specific reason why you would want to prevent mocking to that class?
answered by dhelper
Report User
 (11.9k points)
0 votes
Is there a reason that you couldn't get the class value outside of the recording block: 
[TestFixture]
public class TestFixture
{
    [Test, VerifyMocks]
    public void TestCase()
    {
        NotMockedClass nmObject = new NotMockedClass();
        TestClass testObject = new TestClass();
        var dontMockProperty = nmObject.DontMockProperty;
        using (RecordExpectations recorder = RecorderManager.StartRecording())
        {
            recorder.ExpectAndReturn(testObject.TestMethod(dontMockProperty), 4);
        }
    }
}


ExpectAndReturn doesn't really "cares" what argument you're passing so any string will do
answered by dhelper
Report User
 (11.9k points)
0 votes
Is there a reason that you couldn't get the class value outside of the recording block:


The "NOT" to be tested class has lot of properties used in various other mocked objects. I don't want to create an equivalent primitive type variable for each property. It simply means lot of redundant coding.
answered by bhaveshbusa
Report User
 (1.2k points)
0 votes
Still - why not create the class outside of the recording scope?
answered by dhelper
Report User
 (11.9k points)
...

Products

Help

Company

Community

Contact

Typemock Store (US toll FREE 866–895–4680). Copyright © 2006 Typemock Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use.